Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2026 at 13:01:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Pelecanus
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2026 at 13:01:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#Historical Portrait Photos
Info The memorial plaque lists all participants from the municipality of Mundelfingen who took part in the First World War, including those killed, missing, and those who returned home.
The plaque hangs in the town hall of Mundelfingen (now part of Hüfingen). Because it is protected by glass, it is not easy to photograph it without reflections; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2026 at 11:34:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#North Macedonia
Info The excavations on the archaeological site conducted in 2001 discovered artefacts from the Neolithic, and the fortress with the settlement around it was identified with the late antique Roman town of Armonia. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2026 at 10:57:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Genus : Vulpes (True Foxes)
Info Iceland Arctic Fox. Created by Jonatan Pie, uploaded from unsplash.com by Pearli, nominated by George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Not downsampled version after this nomination George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support A strong candidate for POTY --Laitche (talk) 12:03, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:17, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great, this version works - thanks for the nomination, George. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:12, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2026 at 08:29:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus_:_Luscinia
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:29, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:29, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2026 at 05:46:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Auriculariaceae
Info Auricularia auricula-judae on an old beech tree at the base of a previously cut branch. Focus stack of 23 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:38, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:07, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:37, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Fascinating form and structure. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 21:50:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Accipiter
Info Sparrowhawk had popped up onto a branch to dry off in the sun after taking a bath. Сreated by Caroline Legg – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 21:50, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 21:50, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very pretty, and an unusual pose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:26, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan Kekek.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:37, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:08, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:24, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 08:29, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good pose. --Mile (talk) 09:32, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:37, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Rare photo of a wing-draping pose, beautifully captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 20:05:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#China
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 20:05, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Info This is the tail end of the train. I originally wanted to capture the whole train like File:Line scan photo of Shinkansen N700A Series Set G13 in 2017.png but I missed the start end of the train and then my battery ran out before I could reattempt it.
Support -- dllu (talk) 20:05, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:49, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Another amazing capture, created with this fascinating technique. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes, an unusual technique whereby the train is sharp and the rest is all blurred horizontal lines. Certainly a worthy FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:32, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:39, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:15, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:12, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:13, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 16:42:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Chloephaga
Info I didn't spot the green speculum feathers until my guide told me where to stand. No FPs of this genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Technically great and sharp capture of the bird, but the background is quite busy so I'm not sure if it stands up to the really high bar for FP of birds. dllu (talk) 20:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
- It is different from usual: a bird on a ridge in a city nature reserve. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:45, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support There is plenty of separation between the bird and the background. FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:34, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I am distracted by background. --Mile (talk) 09:28, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 11:41:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info Details: Top of the Monument to the Fallen of the First World War in Ancona, Italy. This is a composition with multiple overlapping photographs, to have enlarged details. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent quality with striking contrast; sky and monument detail are beautifully separated and emphasized. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:58, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:25, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:43, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 21:37, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good FP. You included this note: "HISTORICAL FACT: Although designed as a pure classical temple, Cirilli was obliged by the Fascist regime to add eight fasci littori (fasces) to the summit." Is there any evidence that Cirilli was not happy about putting the fasces in the monument? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- There is no documented evidence that he openly opposed or expressed dissatisfaction about including fascist symbols (such as the fasces) in the Monumento ai Caduti of Ancona. Guido Cirilli was an architect from Ancona who became a leading figure at the Accademia di Belle Arti di Venezia and one of the founders of the IUAV University of Venice. He was the "star pupil" of Giuseppe Sacconi, the architect of the famous Altare della Patria (Vittoriano) in Rome.
- While the overall structure was Cirilli's vision, the monument does contain explicit symbols of the regime that were required for public works at the time.
- In those years, the regime had centralized every decision regarding urban planning and monuments. A project for such a symbolic work (a monument to the fallen of the Great War) had to go through the approval of government commissions and local authorities entirely loyal to the National Fascist Party. If Cirilli had opposed it, the project would have simply been assigned to another architect. The regime's aesthetics: Fascism did not merely govern; it wanted to "brand" the territory. The inclusion of the fasces in the frieze was considered a standard requirement to "officialize" the soldiers' sacrifice within the new fascist era. Guido Cirilli was not a "rebellious" or avant-garde architect; he was a high-level institutional figure (Director of the Academy of Fine Arts in Venice). Open opposition would have meant the end of his academic career and the loss of all public appointments. Moreover, his neoclassical training was naturally appreciated by the regime, which saw in the return to order and in 'Romanitas' its visual identity. Cirilli, therefore, probably did not feel an aesthetic conflict, but rather a formal adaptation. In the 1930s, dissent did not only lead to loss of work, but also to confinement or social ostracism. For a monument that was to be inaugurated by Mussolini himself (in 1932), the absence of regime symbols would have been seen as an act of direct political defiance, a risk that very few professionals were willing to take. Cirilli did not oppose because the system did not allow dissent. The Monument to the Fallen is the result of a compromise: Cirilli's grand classical architecture 'hosts' the signs of the political power of the time in order to exist. In the Ancona Monument, if you look at the frieze, the fasces are inserted with a certain decorative elegance, alternating with floral elements. Cirilli managed to keep the heart of the monument "pure" (the Doric style, Leopardi’s verses), relegating the symbols of the regime to mere ornamental details. This was the highest form of "resistance" or compromise that an architect of the time could exercise. Terragio67 (talk) 10:57, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:36, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:15, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 09:31, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 10:36:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Calendula officinalis stacking. Focus stack of 14 images. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 10:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 10:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful use of light; the author's distinctive style is immediately recognizable, creating a luminous and intimate mood. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:39, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:58, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:04, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 20:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great! Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:41, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 10:03:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cisticolidae_(Cisticolas)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:03, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:03, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Normally it would be hard to pass with such central shot (as picture above on voting). But for that you need good subject (sharp, pose, colors etc). But than still a crop... --Mile (talk) 09:35, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 07:22:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Others
Info created by Wassily Kandinsky, scanned by Google Art & Culture, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info Composition VII is an abstract oil painting by Wassily Kandinsky from 1913, in the collection of the Tretyakov Gallery, in Moscow. Art historians have concluded that the work is a combination of the themes of Resurrection, Judgment Day, the Flood and the Garden of Eden. It is one of the first purely abstract painting in Western art. FP on English Wikipedia.
Support -- Yann (talk) 07:22, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:19, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:57, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:39, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support An important work in the history of abstract art. --Laitche (talk) 05:30, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Some exposure could be add. --Mile (talk) 09:30, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Line scan photo of Yamanote line E235 series
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 05:53:37 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Head of train
-
Tail of train

- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Japan
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 05:53, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 05:53, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 07:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow. This is very good and interesting. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:56, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support A unique, eyecatching motif --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:14, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Strong line-scan photo set with precise lines; at both edges of the second image Tail of train, draining water from the train is visible - a subtle but powerful documentary detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:58, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:37, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 21:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:40, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2026 at 22:43:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 22:43, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 22:43, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:25, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I miss something extraordinary here for the FP star Poco a poco (talk) 06:42, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2026 at 20:49:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Japan
Info created and uploaded by Davekern – nominated by Davekern -- Davekern (talk) 20:49, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Abstain -- As Photographer Davekern (talk) 20:49, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice light. --Yann (talk) 07:15, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2026 at 16:46:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 16:46, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 16:46, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the angle, light, clouds and almost everything else about this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:49, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:35, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Technically good capture, but the composition isn't very "wow" compared to your other nomination below, which is much better in my opinion from an artistic point of view. dllu (talk) 20:29, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2026 at 16:44:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 16:44, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 16:44, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent. It was a stroke of genius to have someone there. --Lmbuga (talk) 00:50, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Pretty building (and a significant one - I read a little on the w:Lorsch Abbey page after I decided to support) in good light, but I agree with Lmbuga that the rest is an inspired composition. I couldn't say exactly why, but it works. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:49, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good composition and details; the subtle comparison with the person on the left is a small but fine touch. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:02, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:25, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Clean composition reminiscent of File:Broadway tower edit.jpg. dllu (talk) 20:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:49, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2026 at 22:35:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Fabriciana
Info No FPs of this genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:35, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:35, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Well-photographed butterfly, with great (and novel!) lighting. Looking at the file history, thanks for catching the artifact. I couldn't find any more. JayCubby (talk) 23:16, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:15, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:12, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support A bit jealous of your mirrorless gear. I'm still on EF... --Laitche (talk) 08:25, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- The two things I like about mirrorless are the built-in focus bracketing and the eye-tracking for flying birds. I dislike the inability of the autofocus to locate small birds in branches or perched dragonflies. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:23, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support A successful color scheme, with the butterfly's colors in perfect harmony with the plant. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:53, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:53, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good shot. Wolverine X-eye 13:47, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:34, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice butterfly, excellent light. --Yann (talk) 07:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:20, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:40, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:59, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:44, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2026 at 21:23:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:23, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:23, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment 2021. Is this an outside wall? I'm assuming there's no potential COM:DW copyright issue, but please address that so that no-one else asks about it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- The building is open from three sides, which makes it an open-air public space, so there’s no potential copyright infringement. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- Which I suppose is free to photograph due to COM:Freedom of Panorama laws, correct? If so, I certainly
Support this good photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:00, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it's free to photograph, and I was allowed to take free pictures of it upon explaining the purpose. The fresco was painted by a Greek artist who donated the work to the monastery and relinquished the copyright, so visitors can take pictures and use them under CC licences.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:08, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- Which I suppose is free to photograph due to COM:Freedom of Panorama laws, correct? If so, I certainly
- The building is open from three sides, which makes it an open-air public space, so there’s no potential copyright infringement. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 07:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2026 at 15:49:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus : Phoenicurus
Info Daurian redstart (female) in Sakai, Osaka. c/u/n by -- Laitche (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Laitche (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice photo of a small bird. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 02:45, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:07, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:55, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:15, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 12:28, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:53, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 18:01, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:38, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:57, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:20, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:47, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:00, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:50, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2026 at 12:30:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Sweden
Info Winter contre-jour photography of Sandhamn chapel in Sandhamn, Stockholm outer archipelago, Sweden. Ceated, uploaded and nominated by ArildV
Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:30, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:04, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 18:34, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great atmosphere, well-handled light, good composition with lines and curves that are very helpful to the viewer, and it feels cold. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:47, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but the sky is burnt. This contrejour photograph is not technically special, in my view. A darker time of the day, for more subtle and soft sunset colors, or HDR imaging, would have been better -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:07, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, and not convinced of the compo either Poco a poco (talk) 06:45, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile Morin. Yann (talk) 07:16, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2026 at 09:01:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Uzbekistan
Info Konya Ark towers (Цитадель Куня-Арк, Koʻhna ark), Itchan Kala, Khiva. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:01, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:01, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:02, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose We have enough FPs of this subject and rhis one is weaker. The bottom crop is too abeupt. Poco a poco (talk) 13:55, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Info Enough FPs !? This is first, and if you mess minarets and towers from other than that is your problem. There might be some sick of your fish ? And what Subject are you talking about ? --Mile (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- Just for the record: I don't usually answer your comments for 2 reasons: 1) they are aggressiv if not insulting and 2) I hardly understand your English Poco a poco (talk) 06:50, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. Very different from other images. Nice quality, interesting presentation. -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per George. JayCubby (talk) 21:11, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I feel like this photo deserves the star. Clear, high-resolution picture of very pretty towers, and the crops are in logical places. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:24, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:04, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per George and Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:18, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 18:34, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per others --Famberhorst (talk) 06:58, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:46, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2026 at 05:13:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info The former collegiate church of St. Lubentius in the Dietkirchen district of Limburg on the west bank of the Lahn. Created and uploaded by Johannes Robalotoff – nominated by Syntaxys -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:13, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Once again, I stumbled across a historic building that, as far as I could tell, had a large selection of images in its main category, but hardly any QIs and no FPs. Many of the photos are redundant in terms of perspective, so I chose an image that is well executed in terms of technique and composition and has QI status. -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:13, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:10, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 23:17, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking citadel-like basilica, clearly photographed with a very good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:26, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:02, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:59, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support in line with the nomination statement. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:55, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:39, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per others --Famberhorst (talk) 07:01, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:46, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:51, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2026 at 22:43:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Toys and Games.
Info created by Lmbuga – uploaded by Lmbuga – nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 22:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Info The traces of childhood. (1/100 sec (0.01), f/20, 200 ISO)--Lmbuga (talk) 22:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 22:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support A delightful picture! I'm sure any kid would be very happy at the sight of something like this at the beach. Well portrayed. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 00:05, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Well done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 16:54, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Sentimental. Wolverine X-eye 21:20, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:15, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:00, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:02, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:45, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2026 at 21:12:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather
Info created by Wikiwillz – uploaded by Wikiwillz – nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Noting this file does not meet the 2nd criteria of 1500×1500px (this file is 1913×1073px), however, clear-quality (not necessarily “high-quality” in terms of size) photographs of tornadoes are extremely rare, let along free-to-use clear-quality photos. Out of all the photos in Category:Pictures of tornadoes in 2025, this is by far the clearest-quality, even if it is not the largest photo. This qualifies as an exception for that criteria point. Solid EV as well, already in use for the infobox of Tornadoes of 2025 Wikipedia article. WeatherWriter (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree. That's big enough to be extremely frightening. I just hope all the people driving on the road got away in time! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:28, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 18:35, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 02:20, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Although even a 4K still from a modern GoPro would have been better image quality than this, it is still amazing that someone got this close to a tornado. I suppose this is probably a cropped frame from a similar camera. Kudos to the stormchaser who was brave enough to get this close. dllu (talk) 06:00, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2026 at 19:57:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Busy compo, but great subject! JayCubby (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment I think a top crop will benefit this picture, keeping only the lights. Just a suggestion. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:45, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I added a new version :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:08, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- @JayCubby + @UnpetitproleX feel free to take a look and comment on the new crop :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:15, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Cropped version
Info created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:08, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:08, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 07:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 14:17, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:51, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 14:15:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1880-1889
Info created by Elliot & Fry – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Info screwed up putting this into the list; sorry for the delay in listing this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:04, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good work, as always. Could you reduce the chroma noise a smidge? JayCubby (talk) 19:55, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Question The color of the restored file is quite different from that of the source image. Do you figure it was a sepia photo that looked like this and that the difference in colors is solely due to deterioration? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- The source image is File:Georgina_Weldon_by_Elliott_&_Fry_-_Original.tif - there is a very differently coloured JPEG as well. As I've seem plenty of photos that look like either one.... Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:17, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The "Source" line in the "Summary" points to https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/d4df2390-c614-012f-6498-58d385a7bc34?canvasIndex=0. Should that be changed? In any event, it's an excellent photo and restoration. There's one little thing you might consider editing: the very small darker area to the right (viewer's left) of her nose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- That is, in fact, the correct link. Click on the download button there, choose the tiff. Will look at the nose. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
- The source image is File:Georgina_Weldon_by_Elliott_&_Fry_-_Original.tif - there is a very differently coloured JPEG as well. As I've seem plenty of photos that look like either one.... Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:17, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:57, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:09, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 14:52, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:44, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 02:14, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2026 at 14:55:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Russia
Info Maly Theatre building, Moscow. Built in 1824. My photo Юрий Д.К. 14:55, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:55, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support In my eyes a beautiful building taken from a perfect angle.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:04, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. I can imagine that taking an image of this motif without disturbing cars etc. may be challenging --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it has been quite hard photo for me as the street is very active (this is center of Moscow). Юрий Д.К. 12:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2026 at 08:57:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info The Wiesenttal between Kirchehrenbach and Pretzfeld. Orthophoto. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 08:57, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 08:57, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:56, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition. --August (talk) 13:11, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good textures. Acroterion (talk) 13:27, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:19, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice shapes and contrast of colours/textures. – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 22:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:22, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive sharpness and detail! How many of the 427.9 meters above sea level in the Metadata were above the ground? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment I guess about 80 to 100 meters.--Ermell (talk) 10:14, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per others. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:32, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 12:28, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:34, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:06, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:52, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2026 at 07:36:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Landscapes
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good leading lines, balanced composition, effective use of black-and-white to emphasize texture, depth, and atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:50, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:51, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Black and white works well here. Acroterion (talk) 13:28, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:25, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:04, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I'm jealous. --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:42, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Merry Christmas! --Laitche (talk) 15:45, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:19, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. Very beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin – Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:31, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 22:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Perfect timing. Wolverine X-eye 23:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin, others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:52, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice atmosphere and b/w finish! --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:11, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:07, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:21, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:53, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:52, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2026 at 04:46:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Mullidae_(Goatfish)
Info Mexican goatfish (Mulloidichthys dentatus), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico. Note: there are no FPs of the genus Mulloidichthys on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 04:46, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 04:46, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 06:05, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:10, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:52, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:19, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 22:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:13, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as above. Technically flawless. JayCubby (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:45, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:07, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 00:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 23:56:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Trachiniformes
Info Latticed sandperch (Parapercis clathrata), Anilao, Philippines. Note:: there are no FPs of this species on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support This is great! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:55, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Indeed. JayCubby (talk) 02:51, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:14, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:50, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:28, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:19, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Also huge gratitude to the photographer with his broad documentation of marine animals :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:00, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Question This is quite dark. Would you give more light? --Yann (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- Agree, will brighten it a bit up as soon as I can. Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent, but I would also like a bit more light.--Lmbuga (talk) 00:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 22:44:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District
Info Parabola granite rock formation in Ergaki Park, Western Sayan Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:51, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. One thing I questioned was whether the rocks under the peaks that don't have moss on them might be too green, but since the peaks clearly have a different white balance, it looks clearly intentional. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- It’s standard Lightroom processing with only basic global tonality edits, no color work and no local adjustments whatsoever, except for a slight (-6) sky darkening. I’m not sure about the green on the rocks, maybe it’s the evening light, or some amount of moss cover, or both. --Argenberg (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent detail, good composition. --Tagooty (talk) 03:35, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 06:17, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:27, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:48, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:39, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 22:25, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support There's nothing quite like the sight of nature. Simply breathtaking. Wolverine X-eye 23:06, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 00:07, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 00:16, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 20:34:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Bignoniaceae
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Wouldn't have guessed it was a drone pic if not for the metadata (speaking of which, could GPS be added?)! JayCubby (talk) 20:54, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- I second that, please explain. Is the tree in some limited-access or restricted area? Otherwise no reason to use a drone instead of a professional camera. --A.Savin 10:18, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- The area is not restricted and it was my only available wide lens camera (I had no wide lens in Brazil) other than my smartphone. The quality is still good enough for FP and this was the most beautiful Pink Ipê tree that I saw, with beautiful size, dense and colorful blooming (most other trees often had lost more flowers) and excellent lighting. So the image is of FP level in my opinion -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:25, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- I second that, please explain. Is the tree in some limited-access or restricted area? Otherwise no reason to use a drone instead of a professional camera. --A.Savin 10:18, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:50, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Giles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:49, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking colours --Tagooty (talk) 03:37, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 04:15, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:31, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:46, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:27, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:27, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful, and good that you thought of using the drone, it has done its job as ‘emergency wide angle’ very well. – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I'm not a fan of pink but my goodness is this beautiful. Wolverine X-eye 23:05, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:14, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:14, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 12:28, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 14:38, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:51, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:10, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:04, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:21, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Also good quality for a drone shot --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:39, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 18:26:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kuwait
Info created by Di7ane – uploaded by Di7ane – nominated by روتانا -- RH🦋 (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- RH🦋 (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment A striking composition but over-sharpened. --August (talk) 20:06, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Augustgeyler but very rare in Kuwait. RH🦋 (talk) 21:09, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Due to over-sharpening August (talk) 00:36, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Augustgeyler but very rare in Kuwait. RH🦋 (talk) 21:09, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:08, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:12, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Technical issue: Although the DJI FC3170 sensor natively outputs images at 8000 × 6000 px, this picture's fine details appear smoothed and lack optical microstructure, indicating likely interpolation or upscaling rather than true optical detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 02:05, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 17:44:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Corvidae
Info An Eurasian magpie (Pica pica) on a rock – c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 17:44, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 17:44, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good to me. For one thing, I like the facial expression. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:01, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 08:19, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:40, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 22:29, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:15, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:22, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 23:50, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 17:40:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)
Info Head of a common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) – c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 17:40, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 17:40, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Really impressive closeup! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Best feather detail I've seen in a while! JayCubby (talk) 02:50, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:35, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:41, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 13:31, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:40, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive detail. Wolverine X-eye 23:07, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 01:57, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:22, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The lighting and the depth of detail are really fine --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:40, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 23:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 17:23:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Saarland
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 17:23, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 17:23, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support To be honest I like it. --Petro Stelte (talk) 16:37, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree, it looks very pleasant in my opinion – Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 09:06, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support In my opinion a beautiful building but the surroundings are a bit messy.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 01:12, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 16:50:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
Info created by Bob Gruen, uploaded by Wcamp9, nominated by Yann
Support The best free picture of John Lennon. Also we have only another color FP portrait from the seventies. -- Yann (talk) 16:50, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 20:19, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 05:58, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:40, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:47, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:25, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per nomination. – Aristeas (talk) 19:12, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 01:25, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:16, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support // Zquid (talk) 23:39, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 14:54:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info created by Romainbehar – uploaded by Romainbehar – nominated by Romainbehar -- Romainbehar (talk) 14:54, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Romainbehar (talk) 14:54, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:06, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:38, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 09:06, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support // Zquid (talk) 23:37, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 08:08:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Otariidae_(Eared_Seals)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:08, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:08, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:24, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mahan (talk) 11:51, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:34, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Any option to crop a bit above and right side. Central position bother a bit. --Mile (talk) 14:10, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Done, new file uploaded with very slight crop -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:17, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 16:27, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support-RH🦋 (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Cute, beautifully colored, and a detailed photograph. JayCubby (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 20:17, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:53, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Appealing nap! -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very peaceful. Where was mommy? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 06:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very pleasing scene. --August (talk) 08:39, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Jay. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:52, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Jay – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Moving. – Aristeas (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Awww...that's so cute :). Wolverine X-eye 23:09, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support exeptional, amazing photo, thank you for your work --Gower (talk) 21:50, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:12, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:36, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:16, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:22, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support An image with a unique message :). Per others --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 19:00, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Another one from my "Will nominate soon"-list... :-) Thank you, @Giles Laurent! // Zquid (talk) 22:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2025 at 07:25:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Prunellidae (Accentors)
Info created by --Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 07:47, 22 December 2025 (UTC) – uploaded by Hobbyfotwoki – nominated by Hobbyfotowiki -- Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 07:25, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:34, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive light which nicely emphasizes even fine details. – Aristeas (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 21:54, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:22, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 01:14, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2025 at 22:10:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#China
Info all by 瑞丽江的河水 -- 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. -- 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Info From description: The Helong Bridge, located on the Jinsha (Upper Yangtze) River at the border between Deqin County in Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, and Derong County in Garzê Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China, was named in honour of General He Long, who led the Chinese Red Army to cross the Jinsha River near this site in 1936. The bridge was built in 1958 and is now preserved as a memorial.
Support @瑞丽江的河水 panorama is more f/10-f/16. --Mile (talk) 14:08, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting bridge in impressive location. The background could be a bit sharper, but IMHO it’s OK. – Choice of aperture: depends on the depth of the scene, on the focal length, the quality of the lens, and the sensor size and resolution. This is a 24mm full-frame photo. On today’s full-frame cameras, ≥ ƒ/11 already introduces a significant amount of diffraction, so we better avoid that if possible. At 24mm, I would try ƒ/6.3 if the lens has a very flat field and is not decentered; with a good choice of the focal point, that should be sufficient to get almost everything in focus and maintain crisp details. If the lens is not perfect, I would try ƒ/8. Only if the lens has a wavy field or is decentered, ƒ/11 may be necessary. – Aristeas (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:25, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:03, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Dust spot on the water surface. Would support if it will be removed Юрий Д.К. 01:23, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:19, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment @瑞丽江的河水, Юрий Д.К. I clear (a lot) of CA (dust spot was easy clean), i put some sharpenig and denoise of sky. I think it is much better. CA was so big, i thought it was Sony, but was new Canon. --Mile (talk) 10:19, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good work Юрий Д.К. 10:25, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2025 at 08:38:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Anser
Info created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:38, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:38, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- What a shy goose! Falcão Alado (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Not shy: sleeping. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:08, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:23, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2025 at 21:30:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District
Info Bog-type lake encircled by wild taiga forest, late at dusk when evening twilight deepens into darkness. Ergaki Range, Sayan Mountains, Siberia. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support IMO, the initial upload shows more detail in the shadow areas. According to suncalc.org, the photo was taken an hour before sunset, which unfortunately made the sky a little too bright for what is otherwise an atmospheric and well-composed image. A HDR would probably be better suited to achieving the desired mood. And unfortunately, the main subject, the dead tree, is cropped at the top. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:06, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral IMO too dark -- XRay 💬 09:39, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per XRay. Yann (talk) 12:49, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Falcão Alado (talk) 18:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys may be right about the original upload having more detail in the shadow. So I made a new version recovering those nuanced shadows and some 0.3 EV exposure boost overall, not breaking the twilight like atmosphere. --Argenberg (talk) 18:05, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Question Is it brighter than it looked now, though? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:33, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- It’s a difficult question. Edits within 0.3 EV are meant to be calibration-like. I created the 21/12 version in an attempt to produce a “daylight-friendly” rendition for viewing in rooms under regular daylight. But having looked at it again on a big calibrated panel in a dark room, I think I still prefer the 20/12 version. It looks more faithful and immersive, dark and deep, as it should be. --Argenberg (talk) 15:05, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- I feel like you should go with the version you prefer, but I do think that somehow, this version works better for me. I promise if you revert, I'll look at my monitor with the lights off to consider it. Meanwhile, you have my
Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:36, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- I feel like you should go with the version you prefer, but I do think that somehow, this version works better for me. I promise if you revert, I'll look at my monitor with the lights off to consider it. Meanwhile, you have my
Oppose Too dark with blown out highlights. Also (just my opinion) the photo doesn't feel remarkable enough for FP. AVDLCZ (talk) 18:42, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unexceptional capture in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:11, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2025 at 15:36:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#India
Info Tea plantations against serried ranges of the Nilgiri Mountains in South India, low clouds glowing in the morning sun. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:36, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 15:36, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 15:51, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I don’t think f/16 was necessary for this shot, but overall it doesn’t seem like an issue. It’s a nice photo. --Laitche (talk) 18:45, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Laitche: You are right, f/8 would have sufficed. I was shooting deep landscapes with a 20-70mm lens, for which f/16 was required. When I switched to the telephoto lens for a few shots. I did not change the aperture setting as I was on a walk with my wife and dogs, who have limited patience for my photography!
--Tagooty (talk) 06:43, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Laitche: You are right, f/8 would have sufficed. I was shooting deep landscapes with a 20-70mm lens, for which f/16 was required. When I switched to the telephoto lens for a few shots. I did not change the aperture setting as I was on a walk with my wife and dogs, who have limited patience for my photography!
Support Great capture - like a beautiful painting; as per Laitche. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:54, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin – Julian Lupyan (talk) 01:51, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment I'm not so sure about this photo, as there's a fair amount of noise, and not only at full size, which is very big. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:53, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I've applied NR to the sky and clouds. How does it look now? --Tagooty (talk) 06:43, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- That's quite a big improvement, thanks. I'm still a bit doubtful that this is one of the very best photos on the site, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- And
Oppose as pretty but with the drawbacks discussed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:58, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- And
- That's quite a big improvement, thanks. I'm still a bit doubtful that this is one of the very best photos on the site, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I've applied NR to the sky and clouds. How does it look now? --Tagooty (talk) 06:43, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Without the house under construction, the image would have a certain wow factor. But in my opinion, it lacks detail and is too blurry, which does not do justice to the technology used. Although according to AI, the temperature at the time the photo was taken was probably below 20 °C, the image looks as if it were taken in a heat haze. I am familiar with this problem from my own photos taken with very long focal lengths, I do not upload such photos anymore. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:32, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Syntaxys: You are right that there is slight heat haze. On a sunny morning with a brisk breeze, slight blurring of vegetation is natural. To me this is part of faithfully capturing the scene, and the telephoto lens is necessary for perspective. A razor sharp image is natural on a cold, still day, or closer with a normal lens. --Tagooty (talk) 12:54, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- I will think about my rating. It is a really beautiful, atmospheric picture, but as I said, the foreground is too busy and cluttered for my taste. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Syntaxys: You are right that there is slight heat haze. On a sunny morning with a brisk breeze, slight blurring of vegetation is natural. To me this is part of faithfully capturing the scene, and the telephoto lens is necessary for perspective. A razor sharp image is natural on a cold, still day, or closer with a normal lens. --Tagooty (talk) 12:54, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Tagooty: I've made a very small, tentative revision this morning, with gentle adjustments to contrast and colour balance and some selective noise reduction. This is just a suggestion, shared via a SwissTransfer link, and of course can be used for an update if it's helpful. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:54, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Radomianin: Thanks for the suggestions -- I've made minor tweaks. --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Falcão Alado (talk) 18:05, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:25, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Love the telephoto perspective. The slight haze is nice, because it adds depth, and in this case even the heat distortion/head haze fits in well (I have seen ‘heat haze’ even on days with ~ 0°C, so the usual name is a bit misleading). It’s just a pity about the central construction site which doesn’t integrate well into the landscape. But all over the world people damage beautiful landscapes and views by egocentric buildings, and so we can also say that the construction site adds a contrast with documentary value to this photo. – Aristeas (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 01:16, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2025 at 09:29:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Uzbekistan
Info Timurid minaret in Gur-e-Emir mausoleum (Мавзолей Гур-Эмир, Goʻri Amir), Samarkand (Timurlenk masouleum). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Info We had Ottomanic minaret (Turks) not so long ago, just to compare how more creative were in East part of Turkmenian (Turk-Mongolian) lands. --Mile (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Strong composition: the column stands out clearly against a softly muted sky and draws the viewer's eye. The technical quality is also convincing. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:58, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:08, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mahan (talk) 12:10, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking composition --Tagooty (talk) 15:39, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The sky and tower work well together. Acroterion (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as above. Good processing brought out great detail. JayCubby (talk) 21:51, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. The grayish sky contrasts well with the very colorful minaret. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:58, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:32, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 09:40, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I like the simple composition and the background would make a great pic, but I'm bothered by the halo and line which make it look overprocessed. Gyrostat (talk) 14:43, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Falcão Alado (talk) 18:07, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:36, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:14, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:26, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:21, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:28, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 01:17, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2025 at 22:04:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info Created, uploaded, and nominated by Julian Lupyan – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Info I felt quite overwhelmed by the scene in front of me while taking this picture, and believe it to be a reasonable representation of the concept of overtourism. There is a moderate lack of detail, but I'm hoping the composition and subject is good enough to compensate for it. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The detail is actually decent. The scale is incredible. JayCubby (talk) 22:31, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree. That's a truly overwhelming, suffocating scene, and the claustrophobia of the composition reflects the feeling you wanted to transmit perfectly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:16, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:45, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:45, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Useful. --Thi (talk) 11:55, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A good documentary image, maybe VI. Not outstanding to merit FP. --Tagooty (talk) 03:46, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:27, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2025 at 10:54:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures
Info created by Koray – uploaded by Koray – nominated by Koray -- Koray (talk) 10:54, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Koray (talk) 10:54, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:57, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:23, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose CAs?, hot pixels?, noise? --Lmbuga (talk) 04:51, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't judging it at the colossal full size, but I guess we should really know what the dimensions of the sculpture are. User:Koray, please add those to the file description if at all possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the height. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:05, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- And I still think the photo is very good at life size. The only problem I see at that size is that part of the top is blown. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:08, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the height. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:05, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn't judging it at the colossal full size, but I guess we should really know what the dimensions of the sculpture are. User:Koray, please add those to the file description if at all possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It's nothing thst the photographer can do about it, but I find the shadows in the eyes a problem Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2025 at 00:38:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces
Info created & uploaded by AsAuSo – nominated by Steven Sun -- Steven Sun (talk) 00:38, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as nominator. -- Steven Sun (talk) 00:38, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I think this would have been an FP if nominated in 2008, but now it's too small to be overwhelmingly impressive. It's still beautiful, though, ergo weak oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:53, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment I would also be interested in the technology used to capture what appears to be a single image with such a dynamic range and low noise in 2008. The image was uploaded in 2020, when we did not yet have such good AI tools as we do today to optimise post-processing. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- The date for the photo that's given in the Summary is 25 November 2008, 00:06:12. The Metadata are confusing to me. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- The EXIF says Photoshop CS4 was used, so it's not entirely implausible... JayCubby (talk) 14:38, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The DateTimeOriginal and time are 2 November 2009, the date and DateTimeDigitized are 00:06, 25 November 2008, but technically speaking, it should be the same timestamp and definitely not a point in time in the past. If post-processing was done with CS4, the basis for such an image from 2008 must be an HDR image or an exposure series, which should be mentioned in the image description. In general, however, it would have been possible to take such low-noise photos at that time, e.g. with a Nikon D3/D3X or high-end Canon. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 07:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- The EXIF says Photoshop CS4 was used, so it's not entirely implausible... JayCubby (talk) 14:38, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- The date for the photo that's given in the Summary is 25 November 2008, 00:06:12. The Metadata are confusing to me. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful image, FP for me Юрий Д.К. 15:57, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:43, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2025 at 16:27:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
Info Lloyd Austin, US Secretary of Defense, speaks at a Pentagon Hall of Heroes induction ceremony in July 2022.
Created by Alexander Kubitza (United States Department of Defense) – uploaded by RandomUserGuy1738 – nominated by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 16:27, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- MB-one (talk) 16:27, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very effective use of perspective and light/shadows. – Aristeas (talk) 10:56, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:30, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:19, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 01:48, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2025 at 08:03:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Деан Лазаревски – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:03, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:03, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good enough quality, especially for a drone. JayCubby (talk) 13:45, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment The sky is noisy. I would support if the noise will be removed. Юрий Д.К. 15:47, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Done I've de-noised the sky. Thanks for noting. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:08, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:41, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 12:04, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I like how the church seems to emerge from the rich vegetation. – Aristeas (talk) 10:52, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 23:43, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 22 Dec → Sat 27 Dec Tue 23 Dec → Sun 28 Dec Wed 24 Dec → Mon 29 Dec Thu 25 Dec → Tue 30 Dec Fri 26 Dec → Wed 31 Dec Sat 27 Dec → Thu 01 Jan
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 18 Dec → Sat 27 Dec Fri 19 Dec → Sun 28 Dec Sat 20 Dec → Mon 29 Dec Sun 21 Dec → Tue 30 Dec Mon 22 Dec → Wed 31 Dec Tue 23 Dec → Thu 01 Jan Wed 24 Dec → Fri 02 Jan Thu 25 Dec → Sat 03 Jan Fri 26 Dec → Sun 04 Jan Sat 27 Dec → Mon 05 Jan
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
