Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
| These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
|---|---|
| Request completed | |
| Request declined | |
| Information | |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard. (This is not a venue for requesting administrative action such as blocks or file clean-up.)
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Requests to check accounts already confirmed on other projects may be declined as redundant.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests
[edit]DJRubinitoYtxd
[edit]- DJRubinitoYtxd (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- DJRubinitoyt2010 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- DJRubinitioYt (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Upload of the same non-free files about the Comerciantes Unidos club of Peru. The first account is blocked indefinitely on Commons. --Ovruni (talk) 07:31, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed together with Rubiand12 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log). All were already blocked. --Lymantria (talk) 10:41, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Ironman33231 and AmyAA234
[edit]- Ironman33231 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- AmyAA234 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Please see https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&oldid=1137293124#Probably_sockpuppetry. Two accounts repeatedly uploading the same rather obscure content; one of them states that they are "not the same account, not the same e-mail and not the same person." The first is clearly true, the second presumably true, but the third very much in doubt and might be clarified by checkuser. Jmabel ! talk 00:39, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, Ironman33231 is
Stale, so there is nothing we can investigate. --Lymantria (talk) 10:33, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
BNJ Nilam
[edit]- BNJ Nilam (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- JH61BN (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)(confirmed at enWiki)
- IdrT Ana (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log) (confirmed at enWiki)
- 23uranand (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Two new photos (1, 2) by IdrT Ana (talk · contribs) were inserted into Wikipedia by 23uranand (talk · contribs) in a few hours. Both photos were found to be taken from Google Maps, similar to 23uranand (talk · contribs)'s recent behavior. 0x0a (talk) 15:51, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
- The amount of data to link IdrT Ana and 23uranand is limited and the results are
Inconclusive, the other two accounts are
Stale. Blocked the two users confirmed at enwiki --Lymantria (talk) 10:29, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Malurosu
[edit]- Malurosu (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Codeusu6549 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: After Malurosu's expulsion, the suspicious account appeared to upload an image of a coat of a city of Bolivia and a photo of a airplane (same topics as the master), so it could be a sockpuppet. Taichi (talk) 06:54, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- Malurosu is
stale --Krd 07:48, 24 December 2025 (UTC) - With the help of Wikidata CU-info the accounts are
Confirmed. Blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 11:55, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Jaredryandloneria
[edit]- Jaredryandloneria (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- KANABAIS (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Before Jaredryandloneria was globally blocked, they were blocked here for using sockpuppets. English Wikipedia just blocked KANABAIS for being a sock of Jaredryandloneria; KANABAIS has also been active on the Commons and should be blocked for block evasion. Sariel Xilo (talk) 16:38, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Results:
Confirmed
- Jaredryandloneria (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- KANABAIS (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Nabakaphoto (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- ContextCube (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Blocked the not (b)locked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 22:57, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
DJ Mixify FUL
[edit]- DJ Mixify FUL (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- IAmJoie (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: re-creation of File:Dj Parisa.jpg for w:diq:DJ Parisa (now deleted as cross-wiki spam). Familiar behaviour of the known LTA. Bencemac (talk) 15:55, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
It looks like a duck to me Blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 16:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Dylam X
[edit]- Dylam X (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- WalkingPie7 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Remenkimi765 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems&oldid=1133690011#Persistent_copyright_violations_by_Dylam_X%3B_also_socking. Both of the suspected related users are mentioned as suspected there; Remenkimi765 has specifically denied it, but I think this has gotten beyond simply taking someone's word. Jmabel ! talk 21:07, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- I endorse this as a non-CU/non-admin who initially filed the case on EnWiki, where Dylam X has been blocked for repeated sockpuppetry pertaining to the Coptic Christian/Egyptian Christian subject area. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:38, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- WalkingPie7 is
Stale but has been confirmed at enwiki. Blocking and tagging them. Remenkimi765 is
Unlikely. --Lymantria (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Lymantria: Remenkimi765 has been blocked on EnWiki based on behavioral evidence after a technically unrelated finding ([1]). I don't think it gets much more blatant behaviorally. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- I have based myself on technical data. --Lymantria (talk) 08:57, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that behavioural evidence here is also convincing, combining with the findings at enwiki I will block and tag them (seen with administrator eyes). --Lymantria (talk) 13:56, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- I have based myself on technical data. --Lymantria (talk) 08:57, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Lymantria: Remenkimi765 has been blocked on EnWiki based on behavioral evidence after a technically unrelated finding ([1]). I don't think it gets much more blatant behaviorally. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- WalkingPie7 is
Atomiccocktail
[edit]- Atomiccocktail (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Einfach machen Hamburg (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Koblenmr7 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Potential socks already checked by User:Squasher at dewiki:
- Prisma-Frankfurt (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Atelier ST Leipzig (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- WP-BAYERN3 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Die Stuttgarter (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Insglück (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Alum-telog (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Communications & Marketing HCOB (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- 99&Ber? (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- GS1 Germany GmbH (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Steinhagen-33803 (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: Due to a massive case of potential paid editing by using sockpuppets on dewp I would like to start an investigation here. User:Atomiccocktail has an account for paid editing User:Einfach machen Hamburg. The dewiki Arbcom forbid AC/EmH to cross-edit in paid articles as well as overreferencing and promotional language, see de:Wikipedia:Schiedsgericht/Anfragen/Einfach machen Hamburg. Since then, EmH went inactive but the customer's pages were still maintained. Some new pages were created which perfectly fit in style and laguage of AC, see de:Wikipedia:Administratoren/Anfragen#Verschleiertes Bezahltes Schreiben in großem Stil. A checkuser-investigation at dewiki was only able to found a single sockpuppet (User:Koblenmr7 with dewiki as homewiki (but never edited here), see de:Wikipedia:Checkuser/Anfragen/Atomiccocktail et al.
For a complete investigation it would be neccesary to check, if there are other accounts involved. NDG (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy after CU at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atomiccocktail and another re-check at dewiki, there were several other accounts found. It seems that we have another puppeteer with these accounts:
- enwiki:
- Alum-telog (talk · contribs)
- Chinofeld (talk · contribs)
- Schumlaschänke (talk · contribs)
- Rotblättrige-73 (talk · contribs)
- Contardes-Bu-09 (talk · contribs)
- SantaSebastianoIzm (talk · contribs)
- Feltengnade-fem (talk · contribs)
- Kopmanshagen (talk · contribs)
- Hansmönch (talk · contribs)
- dewiki:
- Konzertmeister (talk · contribs)
- Albrechtshusen (talk · contribs)
- Wohlweeber (talk · contribs)
- Klaasohnsen (talk · contribs)
- Haberbuschforg (talk · contribs)
- Schauinslanze (talk · contribs)
- Chinofeld (talk · contribs)
- Lendenroth (talk · contribs)
- Litigacampus (talk · contribs)
- Enanfakts (talk · contribs)
- Doegtmann (talk · contribs)
- Mosdorf86 (talk · contribs)
- Rotblättrige-73 (talk · contribs)
- Hansmönch (talk · contribs)
- Schumlaschänke (talk · contribs)
- Advoakaden (talk · contribs)
- Osnakuriere (talk · contribs)
- Wardenhein (talk · contribs)
- SantaSebastianoIzm (talk · contribs)
- WAlbertsleben (talk · contribs)
- Obernollern (talk · contribs)
- Luxperls (talk · contribs)
- Kopmanshagen (talk · contribs)
- Memonotburgian (talk · contribs)
- Memonotburgia (talk · contribs)
- Scottbrown95 (talk · contribs)
- Bernhalter (talk · contribs)
- Bernhalters (talk · contribs)
- NDG (talk) 13:21, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
Declined The overwhelming majority of these are not registered on Commons, meaning we can't do anything with them (check or block). The remainder are stale. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Thatgdperson
[edit]- Thatgdperson (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Nico Holland (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
- Denny4Lyfe (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: a. recreated File:Msheireb-Station.webp as File:Msheireb Station.jpg. b. overwriting edits at special:history/Qatar University Station, special:history/Corniche station, special:history/Free Zone station and special:history/Msheireb station. 0x0a (talk) 14:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 17:29, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- Denny4Lyfe (talk · contribs) is probably a new sock who re-included suspicious images at en:Special:history/Corniche station, en:Special:history/Corniche station, en:Special:history/West Bay Station, etc. For example, File:West-Bay-Qatar-Energy-Staton.png was actually captured from Google Maps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0x0a (talk • contribs)
Confirmed blocked and tagged. --Lymantria (talk) 09:52, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives