Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems

Shortcuts: COM:AN/U • COM:ANU • COM:ANI

• Community portal
  • introduction
• Help desk
• Village pump
  • copyright
  • proposals
  • technical
• Administrators' noticeboard
  • vandalism
  • user problems
  • blocks and protections

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reportswikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergencywikimedia.org.
Vandalism []	User problems []	Blocks and protections []	Other []
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.	Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.	Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.	Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.
Archives
26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1	127, 126, 125, 124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1	42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1	102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

^{Translate this page}

Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

purge Admin backlog

---

Copyright:

• Copyright violations: ~40
• Unfree Flickr files: ~0
• Recent unfree Flickr images: ~3
• No permission since 19 December 2025: ~1
• Media uploaded without a license as of 2025-12: ~73

Other:

• Duplicates: ~88
• Advertisements/spam: ~3
• Personal photos/selfies: ~4
• Other speedy deletions: ~49
• Categories for discussion: 134 months
• Media requiring a split up: ~0
• Requests for unblock: ~6
• Undeletion requests: ~12

Protected edit requests:

• Full protection: ~47
• Interface admin: ~13
• Technical: ~0
• Template protection: ~7
• Protection level: ~0

See also: DR, HMS, …

COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES

• Commons Help desk
• Village pump (general discussion)
  • Copyright
  • Proposals
  • Technical
• Graphics and photography discussion
  • Photography critiques
  • Image improvement
    • Illustration workshop
    • Map workshop
    • Photography workshop
    • Video and sound workshop
• Categories for discussion
• Undeletion requests
• Deletion requests
• Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard
• Translators' noticeboard
• Work requests for bots

---

• Contact administrators
  • Vandalism
  • User problems (Dispute resolution)
  • Blocks and protections
• Bureaucrats' noticeboard
• CheckUser requests
• Oversight requests

---

• Telegram
• IRC ^webchat
• Commons mailing list (archive)
• Commons' bugs on Phabricator

Note

• Before reporting one or more users here, try to resolve the dispute by discussing with them first. (Exception: obvious vandal accounts, spambots, etc.)
• Keep your report as short as possible, but include links as evidence.
• Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
• Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/U|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~ is available for this.
• It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; Please try to remain civil with your comments.
• Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

User:Sekar Kinanthi Kidung Wening (Aka User:Nefrit Lazurit, User:Tayuya Karin, User:Fandy Aprianto Rohman, User:Altair Netraphim)

• Sekar Kinanthi Kidung Wening (talk • contribs • Luxo • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

For continuing to steal photos since the last block.

And controlled a sock puppet(or meat puppet) Inkravtania (talk · contribs) to recreate deleted file. 0x0a (talk) 03:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

More evidence of copyvios has surfaced on their user talk page since the above report.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:14, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Previously on User:Altair Netraphim

• Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_123#h-User:Altair_Netraphim-20250606080300
• Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_122#h-User:Altair_Netraphim-20250513165100

0x0a (talk) 03:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@0x0a: please bring the socking to COM:CHECK. --Lymantria (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

This might not be helpful because they may argue that they use shared computers or networks to edit like before. 0x0a (talk) 02:54, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

@0x0a: Evidently, they want to see your evidence.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:28, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Persistent copyright violations by Dylam X; also socking

• Dylam X (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
• WalkingPie7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Dylam X has uploaded dozens of copyright violations in their brief time on the project, drawing two blocks. This pattern has continued despite final warnings and has escalated into SVG laundering and image modification to prevent easier reverse image searches. An English Wikipedia sockpuppet investigation clearly established that WalkingPie7 is a sockpuppet of Dylam X (technically, WalkingPie7 is the earlier account, but it has remained largely dormant on both EnWiki and the Commons). I think we have long passed the point of no return here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:49, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Look, I'll try to have more insight in the future about Wikipedia's copyright policy. Mind you I'm not and was not purposely trying to cause any type of harm, Any copyright violation that had resulted of the images I uploaded was simply out of knowledge. Dylam X (talk) 12:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

You repeatedly uploaded images that you found elsewhere on the internet as "own works" and outright lied repeatedly about having vectorized other images. You then modified copyrighted images, possibly to make it harder to identify your copyright violations. This has happened over 30 times despite numerous warnings and two blocks. You have clearly shown yourself unwilling to change, despite your repeated promises that you would. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Dylam, please consider this as a warning. Dylam has not uploaded copyvios after September and WalkingPie has not edited 1½ years. But if WalkingPie starts to edit again, then (s)he can be blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

@Taivo: While they have yet to edit on the Commons with the account, WikiEnjoyerXYZ was blocked as a Dylam X sock on EnWikipedia. I think it goes without saying that your warning regarding socking also applies to that account, but I wanted to ensure it was on record here should any issues arise. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

@Taivo: Blatant socking here by Remenkimi765. I recommend blocking all accounts, or at least all active account. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:00, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Please, before jumping to conclusions, I am not Dylam X. I am an Ecclesial Heraldry designer, and I just made this account here and on Wikipedia to upload the rest of my work. I totally get why I am suspected, but I just wanted to solve the recent dispute that Dylam X has been involved in due to uploading copyright and non-free image of the coat of arms. I just wanted to contribute. If you want me to refrain from editing this page and being out of this dispute I have no problem. Thank you. Remenkimi765 (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

I'll request a checkuser here. - Jmabel ! talk 21:01, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done. Now all three accounts are indefinitely blocked due to sockpuppetry. Taivo (talk) 18:20, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Ияд и Фирас

• User: Ияд и Фирас (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• Reasons for reporting: Evasion of block, lock, or ban. Continued copyvio uploading like File:Imaginary flag of the Kingdom of Numidia.png after final warning for doing so.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:35, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done Blocked for a week. Some copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done. I declined unblock request. Taivo (talk) 15:40, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Gérald Garitan (talk · contribs)

I regret to inform you that this high-volume uploader has still not learned to correctly indicate the copyright status of the historical artwork that he photographs, but routinely tags everything as own-work and CC-licensed. Perusing his recent uploads and his talk page will readily reveal the problem. He's been blocked for it before, but he keeps uploading stuff by the hundreds and thousands. He's so prolific we have an entire category just for his problematic uploads. I've been trying to clean up Category:Items with disputed copyright information but I'll be perpetually working uphill if he is not restrained. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done indef-blocked Bedivere (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

It's a shame. If only he were a bit more conscientious and responsive to our community - some of the stuff he uploads really is valuable. I would be in favor of giving him another chance if he demonstrates understanding of the problem and a willingness to correct course. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 06:11, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

I absolutely agree. Looking at his recent uploads, they are valuable, but something like File:Precis de chirurgie 1606354.jpg, a 1619 text, just isn't his "own work", and it shouldn't be that hard to apply the correct public domain tag. Looking at his recent comment after the block on his talk page, he seems to struggle with the Upload Wizard. Maybe we can help him... Gestumblindi (talk) 10:38, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

@Bedivere: I have reached out to him in French trying to precisely explain the issue. Perhaps you could modify the block to only block uploads and allow other edits? That will give him the opportunity to demonstrate his understanding by correcting some of his previous uploads. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 17:36, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Will do. Bedivere (talk) 18:41, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Edit warring by Taylor 49 (talk · contribs) asserting videos are 'screenshots'

Taylor 49 keeps edit warring at Category:Screenshots of logging in into MediaWiki (Special:Diff/1133835069diff) and File:Login.ogv (diff) despite that explanations for why videos are not screenshots, explanations why we should categorize files accurately also in this case, and feedback on my talk by one other user (User:Jmabel).

• It is a fact that videos are not screenshots. We should try to categorize files accurately.
  - This principle is important for example because the more often we make exceptions the less robust and consistent it is, eventually leading to people organizing all sorts of things inaccurately because it suits them better, because of conflicts of interest, or because they would like things to be certain ways despite that these things are false etc.
  A screenshot (also known as screen capture or screen grab) is an analog or digital image that shows the contents of a computer display. A screenshot is created by a (film) camera shooting the screen or the operating system or software running on the device powering the display. so screenshots are only images and not videos. Accuracy does matter. If we weaken accuracy where people can arbitrarily ignore it, categorizing here loses its purpose, meaning and usefulness. Videos of the screen or parts of it are a different concept and called [1] screencasts, video screen captures or screen recordings.
• Screencast videos and screenshots have different purposes / uses – a screenshot usually just shows how something looks like while screencast videos explain/show how things work or function or are being used or can be used etc. Screencast videos are often tutorials while screenshots usually just depict or illustrate a software.
• As explained to Taylor 49, a user coming to the category Category:Login screens or Category:Login for example who is looking for a video is unlikely to look into Category:Screenshots of logging in into MediaWiki because per title that category only contains screenshots. Same applies to other similar categories.

Prototyperspective (talk) 13:33, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Fotos fälschlicherweise gemeldet!!

er/sie hat 2 meiner fotos gemeldet obwohl ICH selbst die fotos gemacht habe. Nadinesophia7 (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

der turelio Nadinesophia7 (talk) 14:51, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

@Nadinesophia7: Welche Fotos? Gemeldet wo? - Jmabel ! talk 20:25, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

@Jmabel: the user seems to have misunderstood the meaning of free licensing and uploaded some game screenshots. Their communication patterns were like social network chatting, too. I engaged in communicating on their talk page. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 23:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

At least 2 files are already deleted, some more strange files under DR. Special:Contributions/Nadinesophia7 No contributions outside of commons so far. -- Taylor 49 (talk) 01:44, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

I've got the feeling that the user is a German female teenager who's behaving like being on some social network. Dunno if we can expect useful contributions, but there's nothing harmful visible. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 01:59, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

User:Singhson67

Nothing this person has uploaded has proper sourcing. Some of them may be free due to age, but they are all just uploaded from various websites. Secretlondon (talk) 18:33, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

@Secretlondon: when you report someone at COM:AN/U, you are supposed to inform them on their user talk page. I will do that for you this time. - Jmabel ! talk 20:28, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Clearly a problem, though most of these files are probably PD. I've blocked them from uploading for two weeks, and hope they come to discuss this so that I do not need to impose a longer or broader block. - Jmabel ! talk 20:37, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

They have not uploaded since 2024 - I reported as I think everything they have uploaded needs looking at. Secretlondon (talk) 22:11, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Ooof. I missed that (though you also might have mentioned that). Then the block will probably have no effect.

Not particularly a user conduct/admin issue then, it's an issue about the files. - Jmabel ! talk 02:09, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done I've set up , which should now contain all of these files. Not sure what more I can do. - Jmabel ! talk 02:19, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

User:Ingvarooo

• Ingvarooo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user

Continued copyvio uploading since the last block. 0x0a (talk) 11:06, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done. I blocked him for 3 months (second block). Taivo (talk) 14:36, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

User:Camilasdandelions

Camilasdandelions (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user - continues to upload copyright violations despite multiple warnings - removed the warnings from their talk page and continued the behaviour - Jcb (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done gave a final warning, spelled out what they need to do differently. If there are further problems, I will certainly block. They've been working in a difficult area, but that does not excuse making more mistakes than not, and ignoring what more experienced people tell them. - Jmabel ! talk 02:16, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

JC55impala6Fo3;DruNkC4icK3n-fre3hoLés

Special:Contributions/JC55impala6Fo3;DruNkC4icK3n-fre3hoLés shows that every edit that this user has made has been completely off-topic and pointless. I don't know what's going on with the user name, either.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done blocked as spam account. GPSLeo (talk) 11:06, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Hanawhorenaughty

Hanawhorenaughty (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions)

Inappropriate username Dronebogus (talk) 15:14, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done Blocked indef., all files deleted. Yann (talk) 16:39, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

User talk:Puritta

Still removing DRs from files (1, 2) without expressing their opinion on the DR in question after previously being warned on their talk page not to engage in this behavior. TansoShoshen (talk) 03:02, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

@TansoShoshen: you seem not to have notified the user of this discussion on their talk page; I will do that for you this time. - Jmabel ! talk 04:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

My apologies, I forgot to save changes, will not happen again. TansoShoshen (talk) 15:04, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

I  Support administrative action. The original infraction was Special:Diff/561151299, with my warning at Special:Diff/569508461.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

User talk:Smyxhmcj

Smyxhmcj (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions)

Four of the photos uploaded by this user have been found to be images from the internet, some of which have been cropped to remove watermarks. This suggests the user was intentionally uploading copyrighted photos. The other uploaded files have not yet been fully verified, but given their poor resolution and size, they are also likely to be infringing on copyright.--MspreilsCN (talk) 03:20, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

@MspreilsCN: you seem not to have notified the user of this discussion on their talk page; I w ill do that for you this time. - Jmabel ! talk 04:14, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

They are a student taking a course taught by User:Hanyangprofessor2, aka User:Piotrus, who needs to know about this. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:33, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek Thanks, I'll issue a warning to the student; feel free to block them. I tell my students about copyright but for many it's "one ear in, one ear out", sigh. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 08:41, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

They're not your only student who's doing this. See this difference. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:59, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

@Smyxhmcj Please explain what happened here? Stealing pictures from the Internet is not allowed. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 08:44, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing this out.

This was my mistake. I used an image from the Internet without fully understanding the copyright requirements. As I have already returned to China, I am currently unable to access Wikipedia to remove the image myself. I will be more careful in the future and will only use images with proper licenses.

Sorry for the trouble caused. ~2025-42845-39 (talk) 09:16, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

You were able to post here. Do you lack the permission to delete images from Wikimedia Commons (not Wikipedia) as an IP user? Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:26, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: that last comment makes no sense to me. Only an administrator can delete images from Wikimedia Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 19:52, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

I didn't know that, though I guess that makes sense because once you've licensed a photo, you can't unilaterally delete it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

@Smyxhmcj: I hope you understand what is going on here. Are any of the photos you uploaded that are actually your own work? If so, which? Please reply here; if I don't hear from you in the next 36 hours, I will have to delete them all on the basis that we can't trust your claims of "own work." - Jmabel ! talk 05:03, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

@Piotrus: if this happens somewhat routinely with your students, could you please adopt some process that checks their work for copyvios, rather than have the burden of checking your students' work fall on the Commons community in general? Either some sort of peer review process, or you doing some checking yourself, or having this sort of thing affect their grade, or something? Or do you already have enough of a process in place that it is surprising that this slipped through? - Jmabel ! talk 05:11, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining.

To clarify, none of the photos I uploaded are my own work. I mistakenly used images from the Internet and marked them as "own work" due to my lack of understanding of the licensing rules.

I understand now, and I am fine with these images being deleted. I will not upload any images in the future unless they are genuinely my own work and properly licensed.

Sorry again for the trouble caused. ~2025-43034-31 (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I will delete these all then. - Jmabel ! talk 00:25, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

@Jmabel I will add a clarification to the syllabus that uploading copyvios will reduce the grade, good idea. Other than that, while I of course check for copyvios myself, please note that in Wikimedia community we all share the burden of both checking the works of new contributors, and recruiting them. Realistically, some do one more than the others. The organizers of wikithons, including teachers, tend to do more of the recruiting, for obvious reasons. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 12:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

It's a bit hard to check the uploads of the students if we dont even know which user accounts are a part of the course in the first place Trade (talk) 21:58, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done uploads all deleted, no other action at this time. @Piotrus: please give some thought to a process that will make this sort of problem less likely in the future. If the checking needs to come from the broader community, perhaps there ought to be a maintenance category applied to the user pages of the people whose work should be checked. - Jmabel ! talk 00:31, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

@Jmabel I like that idea (of a category) a lot. All my students are registered in the educational dashboard system (See https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/users/Piotrus ; for the sample picture uploads from my recent course, see https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/Hanyang_University/Understanding_Small_and_Big_Data_with_Wikis_(2025)/uploads ). While the students are told to upload only free images / ones they took themselves (see https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/User:Hanyangprofessor2/Student_assignments as well as my media module at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hanyangprofessor2/Instructions/6), some will inevitably ignore that requirement. I don't know if the % of bad uploads for students is higher than for an average new contributor (I've never seen any stats related to this), but we can certainly try to categorize educational uploads to get more data clarity. This would likely need to be done throgh reaching WikiEd which runs the dashboard (I've long supported the idea of flagging all student accounts and contributions somehow, but that doesn't seem to be a priority for the devs...). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 04:04, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Probably sockpuppetry

• Ironman33231 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions)
• AmyAA234 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions)

These two accounts are likely the same person. Evidence from User:SteinsplitterBot/Previously deleted files:

Jonteemil (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, we have no idea what are you talking about. Can you please publish the wiki page - Andrea Komljenovic - Scientist? AmyAA234 (talk) 17:12, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

@AmyAA234 This is Wikimedia Commons, where there are no "wiki 'pages'". 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:25, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Who is "we"? And why did you upload those photos claiming that they are your own work when user Ironman3323 is the actual copyright holder per their statement here: [2]? Are you aware that you are committing a copyright violation if you are not Ironman3323 yet falsely claim that you are the one who took those photos? Nakonana (talk) 22:18, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

These two people are not same person, not sure what you are talking about, please put back these images. AmyAA234 (talk) 20:18, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

@AmyAA234 The report has been made in good faith, to allow those with the particular rights to examine this matter and reach a conclusion. Please be patient. There either is a case to answer or there is not. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:23, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

It's not the same account, not the same e-mail and not the same person. I need these images to put back in Wikimedia Commons. AmyAA234 (talk) 20:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

For what purpose do you need the selfies of you on this platform? GPSLeo (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

@GPSLeo Please see w:en:Draft:Andrea Komljenovic, which at present does not show notability, and is unlikely to proceed beyond Draft in its present form. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 23:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done I blocked AmyAA234 for socking, and deleted all files. Yann (talk) 08:37, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

User:Elcobbola and the long-term abuse blocking problem

Hey, don't get me wrong. But every time whenever a user's account was created, Elcobbola decides to quickly block them for "long-term abuse" and revert the stuff they got from them and treat other users like they are nothing! I don't know what to do now at this point from them forward! ~2025-43267-12 (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

After taking a look at Special:Log/Elcobbola, the issue apparently doesn't lie with Elcobbola, but with the users blocked who most likely misunderstood the purpose of Commons (COM:SCOPE) and how to behave here (en:Wikipedia:Competence is required). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 23:06, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I checked and most of the recent accounts Elcobbola blocked for "long-term abuse" were flagged by the abuse filter for possibly being "LTA 257". Interestingly, this temporary account is also flagged by the abuse filter for possibly being "LTA 257". So, I think it is likely this temporary account is related to the accounts that were recently blocked. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 23:16, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Bro, Elcobbola is a threat! I didn't edit anything wrong. I was just trying to edit articles, duh. ~2025-43267-12 (talk) 23:44, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

We don't have articles, they are out of scope.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:51, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

But I'm trying to edit the pages. (That counts as editing articles) ~2025-43267-12 (talk) 23:53, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

@~2025-43267-12: That's funny, both you[3] and Jackrabbituj[4], the last user Elcobbola blocked, have the same meaningless edit to Commons talk:Abuse filter.--Prosfilaes (talk) 07:41, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done I blocked ~2025-43267-12. Yann (talk) 08:32, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

User:Esperantoemilio

• Esperantoemilio (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user

After receiving the final copyvio warning, this user didn't stop uploading same unfree portrait; File:Princehisahito2508.jpg, File:Princehisahito2025.jpg, File:Princehisahitoofjapan.jpg and File:Princehisahito19yrs.jpg . Netora (talk) 08:40, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done Blocked for a week, all files tagged or deleted. Yann (talk) 08:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)